Selenium is an essential element, with clearly shown benefits to health, and, if in deficiency, is connected with ill health and vulnerability to diseases. However, selenium is toxic in higher doses, and the actual margin between deficiency and toxicity onset very narrow. Therefore, caution is advised in selenium administration, especially in its inorganic form.
Selenium has also been shown to counteract toxicity of mercury and methylmercury in animals, as for example in rats exposed to different doses of methylmercury.
[1] It is suggested that ingestion of selenium has an antagonistic effect and counteracts toxicity, for example when methylmercury is taken up via marine fish.
[2] Recent research suggests that not the mercury or methylmercury concentration is the determining factor for the onset and severity of methylmercury’s toxic action, but rather the molar Hg:Se ratio. [3]
These studies have been mainly concern with animals, and carnivorous diet in humans. Rice has also been shown to be a potential source of dietary methylmercury when grown in contaminated paddy fields. Rice grains can contain substantial amounts of methylmercury, and in some areas rice is the main source for methylmercury exposure to humans. [4]
In the presented research we exploit whether Selenium, if supplemented to the irrigation water, influences the toxicity of mercury in rice plants. We report on EC 50 values obtained for plant growth under the influence of mercury, with and without supplement of selenium to the nutrient solution, and the uptake of mercury and selenium into the plants investigated.
[1] Ralston et al., NeuroToxicology, 29, 802, 2008
[2] Ralston, EcoHealth, 5, 442, 2008
[3] Khan and Wang, Environmental Toxicity and Chemistry, 28, 1567, 2009
[4] Zhang et al., Environmental Health Perspectives, 118, 1183, 2010